Malaysia’s Global Minimum Tax: Key Implications for Multinationals

Malaysia has implemented the Global Minimum Tax (GMT) as part of the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS).

Under Malaysia’s GMT framework, two key tax mechanisms have been introduced to ensure compliance with the 15 percent minimum effective tax rate. The Domestic Top-up Tax (DTT) applies to Malaysian entities, ensuring they meet the required tax threshold, while the Multinational Top-up Tax (MTT) is designed for MNEs operating in Malaysia to align their global income taxation with international standards.

Companies falling below this threshold must file a top-up tax return, with transitional penalty relief available to support businesses during the initial implementation phase.

This framework, effective from January 1, 2025, is part of Malaysia’s commitment to aligning its tax policies with OECD guidelines and maintaining competitiveness within the ASEAN region.

Background on the OECD Global Minimum Tax Initiative

The OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework aims to address challenges in taxing digital and global businesses, introducing two pillars. Pillar One reallocates taxing rights to market jurisdictions, while Pillar Two establishes the 15 percent global minimum tax. Malaysia has actively participated in these discussions, aligning its tax policies with international standards.

Countries worldwide are implementing the Global Anti-Base Erosion (GloBE) Rules to prevent tax base erosion. Malaysia joins economies like Germany, the United Kingdom, Australia, Japan, and Korea, all of which have adopted GMT since 2024.

Scope of application in Malaysia

The GMT applies to large MNEs meeting the revenue threshold of EUR 750 million. This affects sectors benefiting from existing tax incentives, including manufacturing, finance, and technology.

Malaysia’s GMT implementation considers:

• Tax incentives: Pioneer status and Multimedia Super Corridor (MSC) benefits may require restructuring to align with GMT requirements.
• Special economic zones: Entities operating in Free Industrial Zones (FIZs) and Labuan International Business and Financial Centre (IBFC) must assess their exposure to the new rules.

Technical implementation details

Malaysia’s approach to GMT compliance involves calculating the effective tax rate for entities to determine any necessary top-up tax, applying substance-based income exclusion rules for qualifying economic activities, and adhering to new filing obligations requiring comprehensive documentation of tax structures, revenue streams, and effective tax positions.

Implementation timelines across ASEAN

ASEAN countries have implemented GMT at different paces, with Malaysia’s 2025 rollout aligning closely with key regional players. Singapore has implemented the IIR and DTT as of January 2025, focusing on a smooth transition with comprehensive data reporting.

Indonesia launched its core tax system in January 2025, leveraging digital administration to streamline compliance. Thailand introduced new tax regulations targeting income transfers and social security adjustments, reflecting a broader regulatory shift.

Vietnam, after initiating public consultation on its Qualified Domestic Minimum Top-up Tax (QDMTT) in late 2024, has confirmed its implementation for 2025, emphasizing domestic tax base protection.

These varied approaches highlight the region’s differing national priorities and regulatory frameworks.

Differences in compliance requirements

Malaysia’s tax framework is structured to ensure compliance with OECD guidelines while maintaining investment appeal. Key differences across ASEAN include:

• Malaysia: Stringent compliance and reporting obligations under enhanced transfer pricing and tax audit frameworks.
• Singapore: Focuses on smooth implementation with comprehensive data reporting requirements.
• Indonesia: Leverages electronic platforms to streamline compliance.
• Thailand: Introduces targeted regulations on income transfers.
• Vietnam: Develops guidelines emphasizing domestic tax base protection.

Impact on Malaysia’s existing tax incentives

Malaysia’s tax incentive landscape has undergone significant adjustments under GMT. Pioneer status, MSC incentives, and tax holidays are being modified to comply with the new tax framework. The government is expected to recalibrate policies to maintain Malaysia’s investment attractiveness.

Implications for companies in Malaysia

Multinational companies must reassess their tax planning strategies and business structures. The financial impact of the new tax rules varies depending on existing incentives, sectoral exposure, and compliance costs. Key considerations include:

• Cash flow adjustments: Companies may need to restructure financial models to account for additional tax liabilities.
• Investment decisions: MNEs evaluating Malaysia must factor in GMT compliance costs against existing tax incentives.
• Restructuring needs: Entities may have to adjust operational models to optimize tax efficiency under the new rules.

Compliance requirements

Companies must meet new documentation and reporting obligations, including:

• Submission of top-up tax returns for entities with an effective tax rate below 15 percent.
• Enhanced transfer pricing documentation and tax audit frameworks.
• Penalties for non-compliance under Malaysia’s Inland Revenue Board (IRBM) enforcement policies.

Regional comparison

Malaysia’s GMT adoption follows a broader regional trend but takes a distinct approach compared to its neighbors. Singapore has maintained its foreign direct investment competitiveness with a business-friendly GMT framework, while Indonesia has emphasized digital tax administration to simplify compliance. Thailand has introduced tax regulations focused on labor and social security, whereas Vietnam has prioritized domestic tax base protection in its policies.

Each ASEAN country has adapted its GMT framework to align with its economic priorities, creating diverse regional compliance landscapes.

While Malaysia remains committed to aligning with OECD standards, uncertainties in enforcement mechanisms and future amendments to compliance regulations could impact long-term tax planning strategies.

• Previous Article How to Set Up a Representative Office in Thailand – A Guide for Foreign Investors
• Next Article Investing in Malaysia – Key Sectors and Opportunities for Foreign Investors